Are We Safe Yet? The Limitations of Distributional Features for Fake News Detection
By Tal Schuster, Roei Schuster, Darsh J. Shah, Regina Barzilay. 2019
14 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Daphne Ippolito
- Daniel Duckworth
- Chris Callison-Burch
- Jacob Hilton
- Douglas Eck
- Owain Evans
- Stephanie C. Lin
- Kevin Gimpel
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Chris Callison-Burch
- Jacob Hilton
- Douglas Eck
- Daniel Duckworth
- Owain Evans
- Stephanie C. Lin
- Daphne Ippolito
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
Citations in the corpus
- Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled (2019, background): “Schuster et al. (2019) argue that the language distributional features implicitly or explicitly employed by these detectors are insufficient; instead, one should look to explicit fact-verification models.”
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods (2021, background): “If models can generate plausible false statements in ways that are not easily identifiable, they could be used to deceive humans via disinformation or fraud (Zellers et al., 2019; Schuster et al., 2019).”
- Human and Automatic Detection of Generated Text (2019, background): “Finally, Schuster et al. (2019) argue that language distributional features implicitly or explicitly used by these detectors are insuf-ficient; instead, one should look to explicit fact-verification models.”