Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog?

By M. Daniels, L. Corbett. 2003

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia (2012, background): “Althoughdomestic dogsof similar size todingoes can cycle twice during the breeding season, there is no evidence that wilddogs can raise two litters to independence inayear (Jones and Stevens 1988; Daniels and Corbett 2003).”
Warring brothers: The complex interactions between wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) in a conservation context (2014, unknown): “The situation is made even more complex because of documented hybridization between domestic dogs (of European origin) and dingoes (Daniels and Corbett, 2003).”
Hybridization and the species problem in conservation (2015, background): “Similar problems cause ongoing controversy over the taxonomic status of North American wolves (NCEAS, 2014), cutthroat trout (Allendorf et al., 2005), dingoes, and wildcats (Daniels and Corbett, 2003), just to name a few.”
What can DNA tell us about biological invasions? (2012, background): “Loss of any native allele can be defined as ''genomic extinction'' (Allendorf et al. 2001; Rhymer and Simberloff 1996) or as a minor genetic change that does not affect the identity or legal status of the native taxon (Daniels and Corbett 2003; Fitzpatrick et al. 2010).”