Mirror symmetry and T-duality in the complement of an anticanonical divisor
By D. Auroux. 2007
413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We study the geometry of complexified moduli spaces of special Lagrangian submanifolds in the complement of an anticanonical divisor in a compact Kahler manifold. In particular, we explore the connections between T-duality and mirror symmetry in concrete examples, and show how quantum corrections arise in this context.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8db5f1fbec3c7cdf62ec0bb35f8149b0c00f1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- P. Seidel
- M. Abouzaid
- I. Smith
- D. Auroux
- Nick Sheridan
- Alexander F. Ritter
- Kai Cieliebak
- L. Katzarkov
In Mathematical Physics
- P. Seidel
- M. Abouzaid
- I. Smith
- D. Auroux
- Nick Sheridan
- Alexander F. Ritter
- Kai Cieliebak
- L. Katzarkov
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- M. Abouzaid
- P. Seidel
- I. Smith
- Nick Sheridan
- L. Katzarkov
- Alexander F. Ritter
- Eric Zaslow
- David Treumann
Citations in the corpus
- Homological mirror symmetry for the genus two curve (2008, background): “A G ] 7 S ep 2 00 9 Homological mirror symmetry for the genus two curve Paul Seidel v5; September 7, 2009”
- The wall-crossing formula and Lagrangian mutations (2017, methodology): “The statement from the last item is the wall-crossing formula which has been predicted by Auroux [3], and in a slightly different context by Kontsevich and Soibelman [23].”
- Lagrangian fibrations on blowups of toric varieties and mirror symmetry for hypersurfaces (2012, background): “The gluing maps for the mirrors of nearby chambers are given by wall-crossing formulae, with instanton corrections accounting for the disc bubbling phenomena that occur as a Lagrangian submanifold is isotoped across a wall of potentially obstructed Lagrangians (see [3] for an informal discussion, an”
- Geometry of canonical bases and mirror symmetry (2013, methodology): “s the cycle class [Dc] ∈H2(ML,Z(1)) of the divisor Dc. ii) The Landau-Ginzburg potential Wc should be obtained by counting the holomorphic discs touching the divisor Dc, as was demonstrated by Auroux [Au1] in examples. iii) In the cluster variety set up the correspondence is much more precise, see S”
- Symplectic Cohomology and q-Intersection Numbers (2010, background): “The dilation condition corresponds to asking for our vector field to contract the holomorphic volume form on X , at least in those cases where the mirror construction is based on such a form (as one can see from [7] for instance, mirrors of open manifolds can also be constructed using volume forms w”
- Infinitely many exotic monotone Lagrangian tori in ℂℙ2 (2014, background): “7 of [2] or equation (2-2) in [15]), we can identify the boundary Maslov-2 convex hull of L with the Newton polytope of the superpotential of L.”
- Cluster varieties from Legendrian knots (2015, background): “nce at one instant of a single double point, the families of objects defined by rank one local systems before and after the critical moment are algebraic tori related by a cluster transformation (c.f. [Aur] or [Sei2, Lec. 11], for example). Here we will give an account of the existence of cluster str”
- Floer cohomology and pencils of quadrics (2010, background): “P. Seidel and I. Smith.”
- The monotone wrapped Fukaya category and the open-closed string map (2012, methodology): “For L = Li = Lj one can use a Morse-Bott model using C∗(L) = CF (L,L) as carried out by Auroux [12].”
- Fukaya A∞-structures Associated to Lefschetz Fibrations. II (2014, background): “More precisely, there is a full subcategory of F(Ē) whose objects are exact Lagrangian submanifolds in E (this appears for instance in [7]), and one can conjecture that this should be isomorphic to a full subcategory of the Landau-Ginzburg category.”
- Punctured holomorphic curves and Lagrangian embeddings (2014, background): “(c) Carrying over arguments from [14] to the CP(2) case, it is shown in [4] that each of the relative homology classes of Maslov number 2 listed in Lemma A.”