Discussion of “Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence”
By Robert J. Bloomfield. 2008
377 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8db17d0504d7cb7a38b5f7fe17d5b7cd969b4cfc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mostafa Monzur Hasan
- Liandong Zhang
- Kristina Rennekamp
- Chansog Kim
- Ke Wang
- Bill McDonald
- Tim Loughran
- Sarah L. C. Zechman
In Finance
- Mostafa Monzur Hasan
- Liandong Zhang
- Kristina Rennekamp
- Chansog Kim
- Ke Wang
- Bill McDonald
- Tim Loughran
- Andrew Van Buskirk
Citations in the corpus
- Textual Analysis of Corporate Disclosures: A Survey of the Literature (2011, background): “The alternative hypothesis is that these disclosures are boilerplate generic disclosures and not informative [SEC, 2003; Bloomfield, 2008].”
- Readability of 10‐K Reports and Stock Price Crash Risk (2019, positive): “10 details about the economic complexity of firms’ business transactions and operating strategies (e.g., Bloomfield 2008; Bushee et al. 2018).”
- Guiding Through the Fog: Financial Statement Complexity and Voluntary Disclosure (2016, positive): “Antecedent work that makes this point includes Bloomfield (2008) and Bushee et al. (2015).”
- The Effects of Reporting Complexity on Small and Large Investor Trading (2010, neutral): “Bloomfield 2008 provides an excellent review of the potential theories why managers may alter their reporting in certain settings.”
- How does readability influence investors' judgments? Consistency of benchmark performance matters (2015, background): “Prior studies (Bloomfield 2008; Li 2008) and regulators (SEC 1998) imply that high readability can improve investors’ understanding of management disclosures, but there has been no evidence of such benefits.”
- Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures (2013, positive): “Bloomfield (2008) notes that there are potentially many explanations for why firms might produce longer and more complex documents.”
- Readability of Narrative Disclosures in 10-K Reports: Does Managerial Ability Matter? (2018, positive): “This evidence is also supported by Bloomfield (2008), who argues that poorly performing firms need to write more text with longer sentences to explain their situation fully to investors.”
- Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from Derivative Lawsuits (2017, methodology): “[2014b], Boone and White [2015], Seo [2016], Schoenfeld [2017]).”
- Disclosure Tone and Shareholder Litigation (2011, background): “We also acknowledge the potential that environmental factors contribute to a firm’s disclosure choices and can also lead to a greater risk of litigation (see, for example, Bloomfield [2008] for a discussion of this ontological explanation).”
- Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability (2012, positive): “Bloomfield (2008) provides a lengthy list of reasons why disclosure readability may be associated with financial performance; each provides a potential explanation for investor behavior.”
- Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise (2019, neutral): “For instance, Bloomfield (2008) provides an alternative explanation for the findings in Li (2008) that firms with lower earnings quality have less readable reports: losses and transitory income are more difficult to communicate.”