What makes you think you're so popular? Self-evaluation maintenance and the subjective side of the "friendship paradox"
By Ezra W. Zuckerman, John T. Jost. 2001
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8da62c63a0aa184d23236690b0a51592319ebf42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- James H. Fowler
- Nicholas A. Christakis
- Johan Ugander
- Cameron A. Marlow
- Lars Backstrom
- Brian Karrer
- Jure Leskovec
- Robb Willer
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- James H. Fowler
- Nicholas A. Christakis
- Johan Ugander
- Lars Backstrom
- Brian Karrer
- Cameron A. Marlow
- Jure Leskovec
- Michael W. Macy
Citations in the corpus
- Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks (2010, background): “This strategy exploits an interesting property of human social networks: on average, the friends of randomly selected people possess more links (have higher degree) and are also more central to the network than the initial, randomly selected people who named them.(14-18) Therefore, we expect a set o”
- The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph (2011, background): “, it is conceptually more appropriate to frame the comparison relative to the median of their friends, psychologizing the question as a matter of asking what one’s ‘class rank’ is amongst one’s peers [34]. Our finding with regard to the median is therefore perhaps more significant: we observe that 83.”