An experimental study on the behaviour under impact loading of metallic cellular materials
By Han Zhao, I. Elnasri, S. Abdennadher. 2005
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d978be15b3bd4d7d02cf55efc873caaaaf49456
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanical Engineering
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments (2017, background): “The macroscopic strain-rate sensitivity of the cellular material are attributed to many sources as follows [170]”
- Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: Part II analysis (2007, background): “From experimental nominal stress–strain curves, it is straight forward to derive the volumetric strain εv from nominal strain εnominal, given that the Poisson’s ratio is set to zero (Zhao et al., 2005) nominal 0 v L L1 ε=−=ε (3) Ac ce pt ed m an us cr ip t Figure 2.”
- Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: Part I Experiments (2007, background): “For example, it is shown that the lateral inertia effect in the impact crushing of honeycomb is responsible for its rate sensitivity (Zhao and Abdennadher, 2004) whereas crushing by cell wall cracking for Cymat aluminium foam is rate insensitive (Zhao et al., 2005).”
- Polypropylene foam behaviour under dynamic loadings : Strain rate, density and microstructure effects (2009, unknown): “The engineering stress s ¼ F / S 0 and true strain e ¼ ln ( 1 þ D l / l 0 ) have been chosen to represent the foam behaviour for two principal reasons: concerning the stress for this material, the variation of the section is not perceptible (the Poisson ratio is close to zero) therefore the real…”
- A numerical study on the rate sensitivity of cellular metals (2009, background): “Brand Material Relative density Processing method Strain-rate effects References ALPORASTM Al, (Ca, Ti, Fe) 0.08–0.1 Batch casting sensitive Paul and Ramamutry (2000) ALPORASTM Al, (Ca, Ti, Fe) 0.106/0.155 Batch casting sensitive Mukai et al. (2006) ALPORASTM Al, (Ca, Ti, Fe) 0.074/ 0.15 Batch casti”
- Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling (2018, unknown): “Indeed, the analytical estimate using Gibson-Ashby equations [1] leads to conclusions that the gas effect in metal foams is negligible even at densification initiation strain [59, 64, 65], whereas the above equations can predict much higher stress enhancement at large strains depending on Poisson’s ”