Learning viewpoint invariant object representations using a temporal coherence principle
By Wolfgang Einhäuser, Jörg F. Hipp, Julian Eggert, Edgar Körner, Peter König. 2005
63 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- German Ignacio Parisi
- Stefan Wermter
- Joel Z. Leibo
- Cornelius Weber
- Tomaso A. Poggio
- Jun Tani
- Pietro Berkes
- Richard E. Turner
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Richard E. Turner
- Tomaso A. Poggio
- Joel Z. Leibo
- Stefan Wermter
- Jun Tani
- Cornelius Weber
- Leyla Isik
- Maneesh Sahani
Citations in the corpus
- Lifelong Learning of Spatiotemporal Representations With Dual-Memory Recurrent Self-Organization (2018, background): “However, specialized mechanisms of slow feature analysis can be implemented that would yield invariance to complex input transformations such as view invariance (e.g., Berkes and Wiskott, 2005; Einhäuser et al., 2005).”
- A Structured Model of Video Reproduces Primary Visual Cortical Organisation (2009, methodology): “In [80,82], the representation is invariant to frequent transformations, such as translation, and the corresponding attribute information (e.g., position) is discarded.”
- Gaze allocation in natural stimuli: Comparing free exploration to head-fixed viewing conditions (2009, background): “These results highlight that temporal continuity is a key principle not only for object recognition (Einhauser, Hipp, Eggert, Korner, & Konig, 2005 ; Wallis & Rolls, 1997 ), but also for attention deployment under natural conditions.”
- Learning and disrupting invariance in visual recognition (2011, methodology): “Temporal association methods are attractive solutions to the problem of invariance development or learning [1] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14].”