The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation

By David S. Bullock, M. Desquilbet. 2000

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d94517be4808c00a1d64bb7abbd945a3f88c9c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biotechnology

1. S. Bonny
2. Daniel W. Drezner

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Bonny
2. Daniel W. Drezner

In Plant Science

1. S. Bonny
2. Daniel W. Drezner

Citations in the corpus

• Globalization, harmonization, and competition: the different pathways to policy convergence (2005, background): “Competitive agricultural producers and biotech firms have invested heavily in assets specific to GMO technology (Bullock and Desquilbet 2002 ; Newell 2003 ), ratcheting up their adjustment costs to more stringent GM standards.”
• Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review (2011, background): “Downstream, separated channels to preserve identity also exist, where a rigorous separation of batches is necessary (Bullock and Desquilbet, 2002).”