Local Proper Scoring Rules

By W. Ehm, Tilmann Gneiting. 2009

8 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. W. Ehm
2. A. P. Dawid
3. Tilmann Gneiting
4. Steffen L. Lauritzen
5. Matthew Parry
6. Roland R. Ramsahai
7. Judea Pearl
8. Andrew Gelman

Citations in the corpus

• Proper local scoring rules (2011, methodology): “x→± p(x) = 0 and limx→± p′(x)/p(x) is finite. However, this excludes the possibility that both pand qare normal densities on X =R, even though, with this choice, db as given by (62) does vanish at ±∞. Ehm and Gneiting (2010, 2012) described alternative conditions on P that do admit this case. In the ”
• Local proper scoring rules of order two (2011, result): “It has to be emphasized that the present work owes a great deal to interactions with Philip Dawid, Steffen Lauritzen and Matthew Parry, which began with their kindly pointing out an error in our previous work [Ehm and Gneiting (2009)].”