Chaos, complexity, and random matrices

By Jordan S. Cotler, Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Junyu Liu, B. Yoshida. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Chaos and complexity entail an entropic and computational obstruction to describing a system, and thus are intrinsically difficult to characterize. In this paper, we consider time evolution by Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) Hamiltonians and analytically compute out-of-time-ordered correlation functions (OTOCs) and frame potentials to quantify scrambling, Haar-randomness, and circuit complexity. While our random matrix analysis gives a qualitatively correct prediction of the late-time behavior of chaotic systems, we find unphysical behavior at early times including an O1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathcal{O}(1) $$\end{document} scrambling time and the apparent breakdown of spatial and temporal locality. The salient feature of GUE Hamiltonians which gives us computational traction is the Haar-invariance of the ensemble, meaning that the ensemble-averaged dynamics look the same in any basis. Motivated by this property of the GUE, we introduce k-invariance as a precise definition of what it means for the dynamics of a quantum system to be described by random matrix theory. We envision that the dynamical onset of approximate k-invariance will be a useful tool for capturing the transition from early-time chaos, as seen by OTOCs, to late-time chaos, as seen by random matrix theory.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d70532e8450f027bb0c18b4c7f27b280a0d001b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. A. Nahum
  2. B. Skinner
  3. J. Ruhman
  4. Nicholas Hunter-Jones
  5. Tianci Zhou
  6. Phil Saad
  7. Matthew Fisher
  8. Yaodong Li

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. J. Ruhman
  2. B. Skinner
  3. A. Nahum
  4. Nicholas Hunter-Jones
  5. Phil Saad
  6. Tianci Zhou
  7. D. Stanford
  8. S. Shenker

Citations in the corpus