Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3 D Classification and Segmentation
By Charles Ruizhongtai Qi. 2016
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3D Vision & Pose
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Dacheng Tao
- Luc Van Gool
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Bernt Schiele
- Alan L. Yuille
In 3D Vision & Pose
- Yaron Lipman
- Jonathan Shlomi
- Kyle Cranmer
- Jason Dourgarian
- Matt Whalen
- Adam Prügel-Bennett
- Pushmeet Kohli
- Matthew DuVall
Citations in the corpus
- Set2Graph: Learning Graphs From Sets (2020, methodology): “…paradigm for designing deep models was used for many different tasks, data modalities and transformations, e.g., set learning (Zaheer et al., 2017; Qi et al., 2017), graph learning (Kipf & Welling, 2016; Gilmer et al., 2017; Veliˇckovi´c et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2019; Kondor et al., 2018; Maron…”
- Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning (2018, positive): “The attention-based MIL operator was used very recently in (Qi et al., 2017), however, the attention was calculated using the dot product and it performed worse than the max operator.”
- Revisiting Point Cloud Shape Classification with a Simple and Effective Baseline (2021, methodology): “3.3 in (Qi et al., 2017b)).”
- FSPool: Learning Set Representations with Featurewise Sort Pooling (2019, methodology): “This has been studied in many works such as Deep Sets (Zaheer et al., 2017) and PointNet (Qi et al., 2017), with universal approximation theorems being proven.”
- On Learning Sets of Symmetric Elements (2020, methodology): “Indeed, models that respect set symmetries, e.g. (Zaheer et al., 2017; Qi et al., 2017), have become the leading approach for solving such tasks.”