Kernel independent component analysis
By Francis R. Bach, Michael I. Jordan. 2003
2,000 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Analytical Chemistry
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Aapo Hyvärinen
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Arthur Gretton
- Francis R. Bach
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Alex Smola
- John Shawe-Taylor
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Yoshua Bengio
- Trevor Darrell
- Mohit Bansal
- Dacheng Tao
- Sergey Levine
- Quoc V. Le
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Yoshua Bengio
- Dacheng Tao
- Jianmin Wang
- Mingsheng Long
- Michael I. Jordan
- David Lopez-Paz
- Trevor Darrell
In Signal Processing
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Aapo Hyvärinen
- Arthur Gretton
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Yoshua Bengio
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- David Lopez-Paz
- Dominik Janzing
Citations in the corpus
- A Sober Look at the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations and their Evaluation (2020, methodology): “In a similar spirit to disentanglement, (non-)linear independent component analysis (Comon, 1994; Bach and Jordan, 2002; Jutten and Karhunen, 2003; Hyvarinen and Morioka, 2016) studies the problem of recovering independent components of a signal.”
- Framing Image Description as a Ranking Task: Data, Models and Evaluation Metrics (2013, methodology): “Most of the systems we present are based on a technique called Kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis (Bach & Jordan, 2002; Hardoon et al., 2004).”
- Beyond CCA: Moment Matching for Multi-View Models (2016, positive): “Importantly, the joint diagonalization type algorithms are known to be more stable in practice (see, e.g., Bach & Jordan, 2003; Podosinnikova et al., 2015).”
- Rethinking LDA: Moment Matching for Discrete ICA (2015, critical): “In practice, the orthogonal joint diagonalization (JD) algorithm is more robust than FastICA (see, e.g., [26, p. 30]) or the spectral algorithm.”
- A Multi-View Embedding Space for Modeling Internet Images, Tags, and Their Semantics (2012, methodology): “However, we will formulate KCCA as solving for a linear projection from the kernel space, because this leads directly to our scalable approximation scheme based on explicit embeddings.”
- Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyonds (2016, methodology): “The covariance operator serves as a basic building block in classical kernel-based methods such as kernel PCA (Schölkopf et al. 1998, Zwald et al. 2004), kernel Fisher discriminant, kernel CCA (Fukumizu et al. 2007), and kernel ICA (Bach and Jordan 2003).”
- Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglement (2019, background): “The search of independent latent components that explain observed data has long been a focus on the probabilistic modeling community (Comon, 1994; Hyv¨arinen & Oja, 2000; Bach & Jordan, 2002).”
- On the Transfer of Disentangled Representations in Realistic Settings (2020, background): “Ideas related to disentangling the factors of variation date back to the non-linear ICA literature (Comon, 1994; Hyv¨arinen and Pajunen, 1999; Bach and Jordan, 2002; Jutten and Karhunen, 2003; Hyvarinen and Morioka, 2016; Hyvarinen et al., 2019; Gresele et al., 2019).”
- On the Fairness of Disentangled Representations (2019, background): “Ideas related to disentangling the factors of variations have a long tradition in machine learning, dating back to the non-linear ICA literature [17, 3, 46, 42, 43, 44, 32].”
- Are Disentangled Representations Helpful for Abstract Visual Reasoning? (2019, background): “Other Related Works Learning disentangled representations is similar in spirit to non-linear ICA, although it relies primarily on (architectural) inductive biases and different degrees of supervision [13, 2, 39, 36, 37, 38, 25, 33, 32].”
- Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations (2018, methodology): “In a similar spirit to disentanglement, (non-)linear independent component analysis (Comon, 1994; Bach & Jordan, 2002; Jutten & Karhunen, 2003; Hyvarinen & Morioka, 2016) studies the problem of recovering independent components of a signal.”
- Computing functions of random variables via reproducing kernel Hilbert space representations (2015, neutral): “In the latter case,we estimate ∥μ[px py]− μ[pxy] ∥∥ (Bach and Jordan 2002; Gretton et al. 2005); in the former case, we estimate ∥μ[p] − μ[p′]∥ (Gretton et al.”
- Filtering with State-Observation Examples via Kernel Monte Carlo Filter (2013, methodology): “approximation works well in practice, since eigenvalues of a kernel matrix often decay very rapidly. Indeed this has been theoretically shown for some cases; see Widom (1963, 1964) and discussions in Bach and Jordan (2002). (ii) A data reduction method based on Kernel Herding, which efficiently selec”
- A Kernel Test for Three-Variable Interactions (2013, background): “Much of the work in this area focuses on measuring or testing pairwise interaction: for instance, the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) or Distance Covariance [1, 2, 3], kernel canonical correlation [4, 5, 6], and mutual information [7].”
- Equivalence of distance-based and RKHS-based statistics in hypothesis testing (2012, methodology): “(2008): we generated univariate random variables from the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) benchmark densities of Bach and Jordan (2002); rotated them in the product space by an angle between 0 and π/4 to introduce dependence; filled additional dimensions with independent Gaussian noise; and, fi”
- Hypothesis testing using pairwise distances and associated kernels (2012, methodology): “…we used an artificial benchmark proposed by Gretton et al. (2008): we generate univariate random variables from the ICA benchmark densities of Bach & Jordan (2002); rotate them in the product space by an angle between 0 and π/4 to introduce dependence; fill additional dimensions with…”
- Kernel Belief Propagation (2011, positive): “In many cases of interest (for instance, when a Gaussian RBF kernel is used), a small ` m will be sufficient to obtain a small residual for the feature matrix, due to the fast decay of the eigenspectrum in feature space (Bach & Jordan, 2002, Appendix C).”
- Hilbert Space Embeddings and Metrics on Probability Measures (2009, methodology): “Keywords: Probability metrics, Homogeneity tests, Independence tests, Kernel methods, Universal kernels, Characteristic kernels, Hilbertian metric, Weak topology.”
- A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem (2006, methodology): “Kernel methods were employed to solve this problem by Bach and Jordan (2002); Gretton et al.”