Backtesting Value-at-Risk Based on Tail Losses
By W. Wong. 2010
57 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d4867402505214786bbad2c2e5875cda9f711e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting (2016, methodology): “Wong (2010) criticizes the statistics proposed by Christoffersen (1998) because they are two-tailed and, consequently, they can reject a risk model for overconservative.”
- A comprehensive review of Value at Risk methodologies (2014, methodology): “We can cite here the residual approach introduced by McNeil and Frey (2000), the censored Gaussian approach proposed by Berkowitz (2001), the functional delta approach of Kerkhof and Melenberg (2004), and the saddlepoint technique introduced by Wong (2008, 2010).”