HST STIS Spectroscopy of the Triple Nucleus of M31: Two Nested Disks in Keplerian Rotation around a Supermassive Black Hole

By R. Bender, J. Kormendy, G. Bower, R. Green, Jens Thomas, A. Danks, T. Gull, J. Hutchings, C. Joseph, M. Kaiser and 5 more. 2005

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) spectroscopy of the nucleus of M31 obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS). Spectra that include the Ca II infrared triplet (λ ≃ 8500 Å) see only the red giant stars in the double brightness peaks P1 and P2. In contrast, spectra taken at λ ≃ 3600-5100 Å are sensitive to the tiny blue nucleus embedded in P2, the lower surface brightness nucleus of the galaxy. P2 has a K-type spectrum, but we find that the blue nucleus has an A-type spectrum: it shows strong Balmer absorption lines. Hence, the blue nucleus is blue not because of AGN light but rather because it is dominated by hot stars. We show that the spectrum is well described by A0 giant stars, A0 dwarf stars, or a 200 Myr old, single-burst stellar population. White dwarfs, in contrast, cannot fit the blue nucleus spectrum. Given the small likelihood for stellar collisions, recent star formation appears to be the most plausible origin of the blue nucleus. In stellar population, size, and velocity dispersion, the blue nucleus is so different from P1 and P2 that we call it P3 and refer to the nucleus of M31 as triple. Because P2 and P3 have very different spectra, we can make a clean decomposition of the red and blue stars and hence measure the light distribution and kinematics of each uncontaminated by the other. The line-of-sight velocity distributions of the red stars near P2 strengthen the support for Tremaine's eccentric disk model. Their wings indicate the presence of stars with velocities of up to 1000 km s-1 on the anti-P1 side of P2. The kinematics of P3 are consistent with a circular stellar disk in Keplerian rotation around a supermassive black hole. If the P3 disk is perfectly thin, then the inclination angle i ≃ 55° is identical within the errors to the inclination of the eccentric disk models for P1+P2 by Peiris & Tremaine and by Salow & Statler. Both disks rotate in the same sense and are almost coplanar. The observed velocity dispersion of P3 is largely caused by blurred rotation and has a maximum value of σ = 1183 ± 201 km s-1. This is much larger than the dispersion σ ≃ 250 km s-1 of the red stars along the same line of sight and is the largest integrated velocity dispersion observed in any galaxy. The rotation curve of P3 is symmetric around its center. It reaches an observed velocity of V = 618 ± 81 km s-1 at radius 0.″05 = 0.19 pc, where the observed velocity dispersion is σ = 674 ± 95 km s-1. The corresponding circular rotation velocity at this radius is ~1700 km s-1. We therefore confirm earlier suggestions that the central dark object interpreted as a supermassive black hole is located in P3. Thin-disk and Schwarzschild models with intrinsic axial ratios b/a ≲ 0.26 corresponding to inclinations between 55° and 58° match the P3 observations very well. Among these models, the best fit and the lowest black hole mass are obtained for a thin-disk model with M• = 1.4 × 108 M☉. Allowing P3 to have some intrinsic thickness and considering possible systematic errors, the 1 σ confidence range becomes (1.1-2.3) × 108 M☉. The black hole mass determined from P3 is independent of but consistent with Peiris & Tremaine's mass estimate based on the eccentric disk model for P1+P2. It is ~2 times larger than the prediction by the correlation between M• and bulge velocity dispersion σbulge. Taken together with other reliable black hole mass determinations in nearby galaxies, notably the Milky Way and M32, this strengthens the evidence that the M•-σbulge relation has significant intrinsic scatter, at least at low black hole masses. We show that any dark star cluster alternative to a black hole must have a half-mass radius ≲0.″03 = 0.11 pc in order to match the observations. Based on this, M31 becomes the third galaxy (after NGC 4258 and our Galaxy) in which clusters of brown dwarf stars or dead stars can be excluded on astrophysical grounds.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d38043b8d3854bac06399e711e3173a660746ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. P. Hopkins
2. L. Hernquist
3. D. M. Alexander
4. Luis C. Ho
5. T. Heckman
6. R. Dav'e
7. Volker Springel
8. E. Quataert

Citations in the corpus

• Nuclear star clusters (2009, background): “The NSC of M 31 hosts an SMBH of 1:1 2:3 10(8) M (Peiris and Tremaine 2003; Bender et al. 2005).”
• Masses and scaling relations for nuclear star clusters, and their co-existence with central black holes (2016, unknown): “The mass of the MBH is MBH = 1.4 × 108M (Bender et al. 2005) and that of the NSC MNSC = 3.5 ± 0.8 × 107M (Lauer et al. 1998; Kormendy & Ho 2013).”
• On the rate of black hole binary mergers in galactic nuclei due to dynamical hardening (2017, background): “Inside this old disk and immediately surrounding the central SMBH is a compact nuclear disk of blue stars with a total mass ∼ 4200 M⊙ and half-power radius ∼ 0.2 pc (Bender et al. 2005; Lauer et al. 1998, 2012).”
• REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES (2012, unknown): “…et al. 2009) ; (3 = Dalla Bontà et al. 2009) ; (4 = Greenhill et al. 2003) ; (5 = Cappellari et al. 2002) ; (6 = Verolme et al. 2002) ; (7 = Bender et al. 2005) ; (8 = Krajnović et al. 2009) ; (9 = Schulze & Gebhardt 2011) ; (10 = Bower et al. 2001) ; (11 = Kuo et al. 2011) ; (12 =…”
• How do massive black holes get their gas (2009, background): “…eccentric stellar and gaseous discs we find at ∼1– 10 pc may explain the nuclear stellar disc seen in M31, which has been the subject of considerable study (see e.g. Lauer et al. 1993; Tremaine 1995; Salow & Statler 2001; Sambhus & Sridhar 2002; Peiris & Tremaine 2003; Bender et al. 2005).”
• STRUCTURE AND FORMATION OF ELLIPTICAL AND SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES (2008, background): “Statler et al. (1999), Kormendy & Bender (1999), Statler (1999), Peiris & Tremaine (2003), and Bender et al. (2005) discuss observational evidence in favor of this model.”
• What drives the growth of black holes (2011, background): “…the growth of the BH; indeed, the presence of nuclear stellar rings close to the BH in nearby quiescent galaxies provide indirect evidence in support of this hypothesis (e.g., Nayakshin & Sunyaev, 2005; Bender et al., 2005; Paumard et al., 2006; Schödel et al., 2007; Hopkins & Quataert, 2010).”
• STELLAR POPULATIONS IN THE CENTRAL 0.5 pc OF THE GALAXY. II. THE INITIAL MASS FUNCTION (2013, background): “Young nuclear star clusters have now been found surrounding supermassive black holes in a number of nearby galaxies (e.g. Lauer et al. 1998; Bender et al. 2005; Seth et al. 2006).”
• Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies (2013, methodology): “We adopt M• determined from P3, the blue cluster part of the triple nucleus (Bender et al. 2005).”
• Bursty stellar populations and obscured active galactic nuclei in galaxy bulges (2007, background): “…observationally linked with the presence of an active galactic nucleus (AGN) (Kauffmann et al. 2003a; Cid Fernandes et al. 2004a; Yip et al. 2004; Bender et al. 2005; Tadhunter et al. 2005; Goto 2006; Yan et al. 2006), with direct implications for the starburst–AGN connection; it is this…”
• A DISK OF YOUNG STARS AT THE GALACTIC CENTER AS DETERMINED BY INDIVIDUAL STELLAR ORBITS (2008, background): “Populations of young stars have also been observed in the nuclei of other galaxies, such as M31 (Bender et al. 2005), suggesting that star formation near a supermassive black hole may be a common, but not understood, phenomenon in galaxy evolution.”