Reading the mind's eye: decoding category information during mental imagery

By Leila Reddy, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Thomas Serre. NeuroImage, 2009

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Category information for visually presented objects can be read out from multi-voxel patterns of fMRI activity in ventral temporal cortex. What is the nature and reliability of these patterns in the absence of any bottom-up visual input, for example, during visual imagery? Here, we first ask how well category information can be decoded for imagined objects, and then compare the representations evoked during imagery and actual viewing. In an fMRI study, four object categories were either visually presented to subjects, or imagined by them. Using pattern classification techniques we could reliably decode category information (including for non-special categories, i.e., food and tools) from ventral temporal cortex in both conditions, but only during actual viewing from retinotopic areas. Interestingly, in temporal cortex when the classifier was trained on the viewed condition and tested on the imagined condition, or vice-versa, classification performance was comparable to within the imagined condition. The above results held even when we did not use information in the specialized category-selective areas. Thus, the patterns of representation during imagery and actual viewing are in fact surprisingly similar to each other. Consistent with this observation, the maps of “diagnostic voxels” (i.e., the classifier weights) for the perception and imagery classifiers were more similar in ventral temporal cortex than in retinotopic cortex. These results suggest that in the absence of any bottom-up input cortical back projections can selectively re-activate specific patterns of neural activity.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d2a60c28ff7acaa0032751b7a467b3f6e355a00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Alex Clarke
  2. Alessandro Lenci
  3. Lorraine K. Tyler

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Alessandro Lenci

Citations in the corpus