Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions

By Jig Han Jeong, Jonathan P. Resop, N. Mueller, D. Fleisher, Kyungdahm Yun, E. Butler, Dennis Timlin, K. Shim, James Gerber, Vangimalla R. Reddy and 1 more. PLoS ONE, 2016

715 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Accurate predictions of crop yield are critical for developing effective agricultural and food policies at the regional and global scales. We evaluated a machine-learning method, Random Forests (RF), for its ability to predict crop yield responses to climate and biophysical variables at global and regional scales in wheat, maize, and potato in comparison with multiple linear regressions (MLR) serving as a benchmark. We used crop yield data from various sources and regions for model training and testing: 1) gridded global wheat grain yield, 2) maize grain yield from US counties over thirty years, and 3) potato tuber and maize silage yield from the northeastern seaboard region. RF was found highly capable of predicting crop yields and outperformed MLR benchmarks in all performance statistics that were compared. For example, the root mean square errors (RMSE) ranged between 6 and 14% of the average observed yield with RF models in all test cases whereas these values ranged from 14% to 49% for MLR models. Our results show that RF is an effective and versatile machine-learning method for crop yield predictions at regional and global scales for its high accuracy and precision, ease of use, and utility in data analysis. RF may result in a loss of accuracy when predicting the extreme ends or responses beyond the boundaries of the training data.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d25708abc05c1a7f4c500212e4957396c7a49e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

  1. D. Ray
  2. Nicolai Meinshausen
  3. Sotirios V. Archontoulis

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Sotirios V. Archontoulis
  2. Lizhi Wang
  3. Saeed Khaki
  4. Hendrik Boogaard
  5. Ioannis N. Athanasiadis
  6. Allard de Wit
  7. D. Ray
  8. Christos Pylianidis

In Plant Science

  1. Sotirios V. Archontoulis
  2. Lizhi Wang
  3. Saeed Khaki
  4. Allard de Wit
  5. D. Ray

Citations in the corpus