The Fossil Record of Shell-Breaking Predation on Marine Bivalves and Gastropods

By R. Alexander, G. Dietl. 2003

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d23b1e96673c87331334e5ab5a6fec3a8273339

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Harper
2. J. Clements
3. L. Peck
4. M. Kowalewski
5. W. Kiessling
6. H. Pörtner
7. Malcolm R. Clark

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. L. Peck
2. M. Kowalewski
3. E. Harper

In Oceanography

1. W. Kiessling
2. M. Aberhan
3. L. Peck
4. E. Harper
5. J. Clements
6. M. Kowalewski
7. H. Pörtner
8. Malcolm R. Clark

Citations in the corpus

• Predation in the marine fossil record: Studies, data, recognition, environmental factors, and behavior (2019, methodology): “These methods are useful in different situations; the percent of shells with scars most closely reflects selection pressure (Alexander and Dietl, 2003).”
• Latitudinal and depth gradients in marine predation pressure (2016, methodology): “The relative merits of these two metrics are difficult to assess, so both were calculated in order to provide comparable data for future studies, as recommended by Alexander & Dietl (2003).”
• Testing the role of biological interactions in the evolution of mid-Mesozoic marine benthic ecosystems (2006, background): “Independent evidence of the importance of predation as a selective force comes from the record of drilling and repaired shell injuries (e.g., Kelley and Hansen 2003; Alexander and Dietl 2003).”