Geoefficiency and energy partitioning in CIR-driven and CME-driven storms

By N. Turner, W. Cramer, S. Earles, B. Emery. 2009

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d1acfbfd284f0bdad1e67e981d4f2987c0bfe16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. H. Cane
2. I. G. Richardson
3. E. Kilpua
4. R. Steiger
5. A. Balogh
6. Ying Liu
7. R. Schwenn
8. J. Borovsky

Citations in the corpus

• Near-earth solar wind flows and related geomagnetic activity during more than four solar cycles (1963-2011) (2012, background): “…valuable for studies of the magnetospheric and ionospheric response to different types of solar wind structures (e.g., Emery et al. 2009, 2011; Turner et al. 2009) and is available at the CEDAR workshop web site (http://cedarweb.hao. ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/Tools_and_Models:Solar_Wind_…”
• Geoeffective Properties of Solar Transients and Stream Interaction Regions (2017, background): “The studies comparing coupling efficiency for different storm drivers (e.g., Turner et al. 2009; Yermolaev et al. 2010; Myllys et al. 2016) show that ICMEs, despite being the key drivers of intense geomagnetic storms, have on average the weakest coupling efficiency.”