Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties: Evidence from State and Local Governments in the First Half of the 20th Century
By Thomas W. Gilligan, John G. Matsusaka. National tax journal, 2001
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d12f3aac5b0dc93aa2ae8b6533339fe0395d645
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Does the Size of the Legislature Affect the Size of Government? Evidence from Two Natural Experiments (2012, unknown): “Recent empirical research (e.g. Baqir 2001, Bradbury and Crain 2001, Bradbury and Stephenson 2003, and Gilligan and Matsusaka 1995, 2001) has found a positive relationship between the size of the legislature and the size of government.1 While these findings have been interpreted as providing strong…”
- Social and political forces as determinants of poverty: A spatial analysis (2007, background): “Congressional representation has been linked to the distribution of government-controlled economic benefits (Matsusaka, 1995; Gilligan and Matsusaka, 1995, 2000; Levitt and Poterba, 1999).”
- Merged municipalities, higher debt: on free-riding and the common pool problem in politics (2010, unknown): “Most such studies support the law of 1/n, e.g., Gilligan and Matsusaka (1995, 2001), Bradbury and Crain (2001), Baqir (2002), and Bradbury and Stephenson (2003).”
- Districting and Government Overspending (2001, unknown): “For state-level studies, see Alt and Lowry (1994), Poterba (1994), Bayoumi and Eichengreen (1995), Gilligan and Matsusaka (1995, 2001), and Bohn and Inman (1996), among others.”