Bayesian Analysis of Markov Point Processes
By Kasper K. Berthelsen, Jesper Møller. 2006
26 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Thomas J. Leininger
- Rasmus Waagepetersen
- Jesper Møller
- Alex Kulesza
- B. Taskar
- M. V. Lieshout
- Yongtao Guan
In Mathematical Physics
- Rasmus Waagepetersen
- Alex Kulesza
- B. Taskar
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Thomas J. Leininger
- Jesper Møller
- L. Elisa Celis
- Vijay Keswani
In Statistics and Probability
- Rasmus Waagepetersen
- B. Taskar
- Alex Kulesza
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Thomas J. Leininger
- Jesper Møller
- Athanasios Kottas
- Andrew Gelman
Citations in the corpus
- Determinantal Point Processes for Machine Learning (2012, methodology): “…pseudolikelihood [Besag, 1977, Besag et al., 1982, Jensen and Moller, 1991, Ripley, 1991], Markov chain Monte Carlo methods [Ripley and Kelly, 1977, Besag and Green, 1993, Häggström et al., 1999, Berthelsen and Møller, 2006], and other approximations [Ogata and Tanemura, 1985, Diggle et al., 1994].”
- Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * (2007, methodology): “Based on perfect simulation (section 9.3) and auxiliary variable MCMC methods (Møller et al., 2006), progress on Bayesian inference for Markov point processes has been made in Berthelsen & Møller (2003, 2004, 2006, 2007).”
- Bayesian Inference and Model Assessment for Spatial Point Patterns Using Posterior Predictive Samples (2017, methodology): “Berthelsen and Møller (2006) further study this approach and demonstrate its use for Strauss processes and we employ it below.”