Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysis

By Alessio Benavoli, Giorgio Corani, Jaka Demsar, Marco Zaffalon. Journal of machine learning research, 2016

496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The machine learning community adopted the use of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) in order to ensure the statistical validity of results. Many scientific fields however realized the shortcomings of frequentist reasoning and in the most radical cases even banned its use in publications. We should do the same: just as we have embraced the Bayesian paradigm in the development of new machine learning methods, so we should also use it in the analysis of our own results. We argue for abandonment of NHST by exposing its fallacies and, more importantly, offer better - more sound and useful - alternatives for it.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ce2c4a374e8b37e3eef080c956f22cfc6ea25d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Swagatam Das
  2. Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan
  3. Francisco Herrera
  4. Salvador Garcia
  5. Seyedali Mirjalili
  6. Daniel Molina
  7. Carlos Artemio Coello Coello
  8. Yaochu Jin

Citations in the corpus