The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics

By Mehdi Moussaïd, N. Perozo, Simon Garnier, Dirk Helbing, Guy Theraulaz. PLoS ONE, 2010

1,124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Human crowd motion is mainly driven by self-organized processes based on local interactions among pedestrians. While most studies of crowd behaviour consider only interactions among isolated individuals, it turns out that up to 70% of people in a crowd are actually moving in groups, such as friends, couples, or families walking together. These groups constitute medium-scale aggregated structures and their impact on crowd dynamics is still largely unknown. In this work, we analyze the motion of approximately 1500 pedestrian groups under natural condition, and show that social interactions among group members generate typical group walking patterns that influence crowd dynamics. At low density, group members tend to walk side by side, forming a line perpendicular to the walking direction. As the density increases, however, the linear walking formation is bent forward, turning it into a V-like pattern. These spatial patterns can be well described by a model based on social communication between group members. We show that the V-like walking pattern facilitates social interactions within the group, but reduces the flow because of its “non-aerodynamic” shape. Therefore, when crowd density increases, the group organization results from a trade-off between walking faster and facilitating social exchange. These insights demonstrate that crowd dynamics is not only determined by physical constraints induced by other pedestrians and the environment, but also significantly by communicative, social interactions among individuals.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cc8bda43875b6a74993a4264d4a7233ff9554f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Andreas Schadschneider
  2. Dirk Helbing
  3. Pratik Mukerji
  4. Kai Oliver Arras
  5. Filippo Simini
  6. Andrey Rudenko
  7. Dariu M. Gavrila
  8. Christian G. Claudel

In Ocean Engineering

  1. Xiaogang Wang
  2. Wanli Ouyang
  3. Dirk Helbing
  4. Kai Oliver Arras
  5. Andreas Schadschneider
  6. Pratik Mukerji
  7. Vishal M. Patel
  8. Vishwanath A. Sindagi

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

  1. Vishal M. Patel
  2. Vishwanath A. Sindagi
  3. Kai Oliver Arras
  4. Dariu M. Gavrila
  5. Christian G. Claudel
  6. Dirk Helbing
  7. Andreas Schadschneider
  8. Kris M. Kitani

Citations in the corpus