Stellar and dynamical masses of ellipticals in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

By Nikhil Padmanabhan, Uros Seljak, M. Strauss, M. Blanton, G. Kauffmann, David Schlegel, Christy A. Tremonti, N. Bahcall, Mariangela Bernardi, J. Brinkmann and 2 more. 2003

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We study the variation of the dark matter mass fraction of elliptical galaxies as a function of their luminosity, stellar mass, and size using a sample of 29,469 elliptical galaxies culled from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We model ellipticals as a stellar Hernquist profile embedded in an adiabatically compressed dark matter halo. This model allows us to estimate a dynamical mass (Mdynm) at the half-light radius from the velocity dispersion of the spectra, and to compare these to the stellar mass estimates (M*) from Kauffmann et al. [MNRAS 341 (2003) 33]. We find that M*/L is independent of luminosity, while Mdynm/L increases with luminosity, implying that the dark matter fraction increases with luminosity. We also observe that at a fixed luminosity or stellar mass, the dark matter fraction increases with increasing galaxy size or, equivalently, increases with decreasing surface brightness: high surface brightness galaxies show almost no evidence for dark matter, while in low surface brightness galaxies, the dark matter exceeds the stellar mass at the half-light radius. We relate this to the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies, suggesting that the tilt of this plane from simple virial predictions is due to the dark matter in galaxies. We find that a simple model where galaxies are embedded in dark matter halos and have a star formation efficiency independent of their surface brightness explains these trends. We estimate the virial mass of ellipticals as being approximately 7–30 times their stellar mass, with the lower limit suggesting almost all of the gas within the virial radius is converted into stars.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cb9fbe684ac03a7088c436c11878bbdeea23552

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Volker Springel
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. M. Cappellari
  8. T. Naab

In Ecology

  1. F. V. D. Bosch
  2. H. Mo
  3. Xiaohu Yang
  4. M. Blanton
  5. J. Brinkmann
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. Rachel Mandelbaum
  8. G. Kauffmann

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. F. V. D. Bosch
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. G. Kauffmann
  6. M. Blanton
  7. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  8. J. Brinkmann

Citations in the corpus