Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: a review

By Hannah M Murphy, G. Jenkins. 2010

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cb63c77aa212953a1ea8b5cce798b92c1e743f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video (2017, methodology): “Nevertheless, as each study has aims that vary, the appropriate method to use should be selected on a case-by-case basis (see Murphy and Jenkins (2010) or Mallet and Pelletier (2014) for a review of the benefits and biases of these methods in relation to BRUVS).”
Calibration of pelagic stereo‐BRUVs and scientific longline surveys for sampling sharks (2014, background): “These technical advances dramatically increase the opportunities for in situ ecological and behavioural research in vast and remote environments such as the open ocean (Murphy & Jenkins 2010).”
Species-specific detection and quantification of environmental DNA from marine fishes in the Baltic Sea (2019, background): “Although fisheries surveys today provide valuable estimates of fish stocks and distributions for commercially important fish species, there is a need for the development of non-invasive methods that are capable of monitoring marine resources and biodiversity more broadly (Murphy and Jenkins, 2010).”
Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: A review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012) (2014, background): “Murphy and Jenkins (2010) reviewed the observation methods used for spatial 46 monitoring of fish and associated habitats.”
A comparison of visual‐ and stereo‐video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia (2013, methodology): “…issue in the development of marine research and monitoring programs is the identification of robust methodologies aimed at detecting spatial and temporal changes in abundance, diversity, and biomass of faunal assemblages (e.g., Maxwell and Jennings 2005; Cheal et al. 2008; Murphy and Jenkins 2010).”
Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations (2013, methodology): “Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are increasingly being employed to estimate the diversity and abundance of fish (e.g. Cappo & Brown 1996, Willis & Babcock 2000, Murphy & Jenkins 2010, Heagney et al. unpubl.).”
Habitat suitability for marine fishes using presence-only modelling and multibeam sonar (2010, background): “However, video-based survey methods also have a number of disadvantages, including restricted field of view and the need for high water clarity (Murphy & Jenkins 2010).”