A Survey and Evaluation of the Potentials of Distributed Ledger Technology for Peer-to-Peer Transactive Energy Exchanges in Local Energy Markets

By Pierluigi Siano, G. De Marco, Alejandro Rolán, Vincenzo Loia. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The unpredictability and intermittency introduced by Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) in power systems may lead to unforeseen peaks of energy production, which might differ from energy demand. To manage these mismatches, a proper communication between prosumers (i.e., users with RESs that can either inject or absorb energy) and active users (i.e., users that agree to have their loads changed according to the system needs) is required. To achieve this goal, the centralized approach used in traditional power systems is no longer possible because both prosumers and active users would like to take part in energy transactions, and a decentralized approach based on transactive energy systems (TESs) and Peer-to-Peer (P2P) energy transactions should be adopted. In this context, the Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), based on the blockchain concept arises as the most promising solution to enable smart contracts between prosumers and active users, which are safely guarded in blocks with cryptographic hashes. The aim of this paper is to provide a review about the deployment of decentralized TESs and to propose and discuss a transactive management infrastructure. In this context, the concept of Proof of Energy is proposed as a novel consensus protocol for P2P energy exchanges managed by DLT. An application of the proposed infrastructure considering a Virtual Power Plant (VPP) aggregator and residential prosumers endowed with a new transactive controller to manage the electrical storage system is discussed.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ca242c92e0faf7114431efc6f1423c3eb8f7cdf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Chau Yuen
  2. Wayes Tushar
  3. Tapan Kumar Saha
  4. H. Vincent Poor
  5. Ayman Esmat
  6. Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal
  7. Dick H. J. Epema
  8. Peter Palensky

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. H. Vincent Poor
  2. Chau Yuen
  3. Wayes Tushar
  4. Tapan Kumar Saha
  5. Dusist Niyato
  6. Ayman Esmat
  7. Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal
  8. Dick H. J. Epema

In Information Systems

  1. Ayman Esmat
  2. Jun Zhao
  3. Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal
  4. Chau Yuen
  5. H. Vincent Poor
  6. Dusist Niyato
  7. Wayes Tushar
  8. Petr Musilek

Citations in the corpus