The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration.

By S. Khan, R. Mulvaney, T. Ellsworth, C. Boast. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2007

751 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Intensive use of N fertilizers in modern agriculture is motivated by the economic value of high grain yields and is generally perceived to sequester soil organic C by increasing the input of crop residues. This perception is at odds with a century of soil organic C data reported herein for the Morrow Plots, the world's oldest experimental site under continuous corn (Zea mays L.). After 40 to 50 yr of synthetic fertilization that exceeded grain N removal by 60 to 190%, a net decline occurred in soil C despite increasingly massive residue C incorporation, the decline being more extensive for a corn-soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) or corn-oats (Avena sativa L.)-hay rotation than for continuous corn and of greater intensity for the profile (0-46 cm) than the surface soil. These findings implicate fertilizer N in promoting the decomposition of crop residues and soil organic matter and are consistent with data from numerous cropping experiments involving synthetic N fertilization in the USA Corn Belt and elsewhere, although not with the interpretation usually provided. There are important implications for soil C sequestration because the yield-based input of fertilizer N has commonly exceeded grain N removal for corn production on fertile soils since the 1960s. To mitigate the ongoing consequences of soil deterioration, atmospheric CO(2) enrichment, and NO(3)(-) pollution of ground and surface waters, N fertilization should be managed by site-specific assessment of soil N availability. Current fertilizer N management practices, if combined with corn stover removal for bioenergy production, exacerbate soil C loss.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c7072032538c84201e43d1f78caa61dc49cb698

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Rattan Lal
  2. P. Eldor
  3. D. Pimentel
  4. G. Paul
  5. J. Kyriazis
  6. Marissa Karpoff
  7. Tim Krueger
  8. R. McCormack

In Environmental Chemistry

  1. Johan Six
  2. Rattan Lal
  3. A. Marklein
  4. D. Pimentel

In Soil Science

  1. D. Pimentel
  2. Johan Six
  3. Vera Eory
  4. Athanasios Balafoutis
  5. Tamme van der Wal
  6. M. Gómez-Barbero
  7. I. Soto
  8. Spyros Fountas

Citations in the corpus