Innovation in climate policy models: Implementing lessons from the economics of R&D

By David Popp. 2006

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c6e46f7149abe4adaea5d870357a3b3bcc571ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Environmental and climate innovation: Limitations, policies and prices (2013, background): “Different climate models with technological change make different assumptions about it (Popp, 2006).”
Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market (2012, methodology): “To see this, figure 1 also plots the share of patents protecting nongreenhouse gas “pollution control technologies,” as defined by Popp (2006), which does not display the same structural break (one cannot reject the hypothesis of no structural break in 2005 at conventional significance levels).12…”
Modelling innovation and the macroeconomics of low-carbon transitions: theory, perspectives and practical use (2019, unknown): “…reviews on the representation of energy-related innovation in E3 models have been written (Baccianti & Löschel, 2014; Clarke, Weyant, & Edmonds, 2008; Gillingham, Newell, & Pizer, 2008; Grubb et al., 2002; Hall & Buckley, 2016; Köhler, Grubb, Popp, & Edenhofer, 2006; Löschel, 2002; Popp, 2006).”
Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations (2017, result): “Both confirm the results of an earlier patent-based study that energy prices have the largest inducement effect on energyrelated innovations.(15) A third study analyses 3412 firm-level patent data from 80 countries for the car industry between 1965 and 2005, concluding that firms tend to innovate mo”
Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? (2018, background): “…the well-known double externality that characterizes green technology (e.g., Jaffe et al., 2003), which is used by economists to justify implementation of environmental regulations and actions to support green technological change (e.g., through R&D subsidies) (Popp, 2006; Acemoglu et al., 2012).”