A reassessment of Normania and Triguera (Solanaceae)
By L. Bohs, R. Olmstead. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2001
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c64d0c57e161dde3983de78db92d39e7f01f865
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
- Richard E. Olmstead
- Terri L. Weese
- J. Silvertown
- Boris Igic
- J. Kohn
- L. Bohs
- Sarah M. Emery
- J. Levine
Citations in the corpus
- The monophyly of island radiations: an evaluation of niche pre‐emption and some alternative explanations (2005, background): “2000; Böhs & Olmstead 2001; Barber et al .”
- A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae (2008, background): “Several genera (Cyphomandra, Lycopersicon, Normania, Triguera) have been shown to belong within Solanum (Olmstead & Palmer, 1992; Spooner & al., 1993; Bohs & Olmstead, 2001).”
- A Three-Gene Phylogeny of the Genus Solanum (Solanaceae) (2007, methodology): “…pinnatisectum, and S. brevicaule, are derived within the clade and are closely related to tomato (S. lycopersicum) and its wild relative S. juglandifolium, consistent with results of numerous previous studies (Olmstead and Palmer 1992, 1997; Spooner et al. 1993; Bohs and Olmstead 2001; Bohs 2005).”
- The ghost of competition past in the phylogeny of island endemic plants (2004, background): “Pachycladae 53 Molero et al. (2002) 15 Solanaceae Solanum 42 Bohs & Olmstead (2001) 16 Araliaceae Hedera 33 Vargas et al. (1999) 17 Fabaceae Adenocarpus 31 Percy & Cronk (2002) 18 Agavaceae Dracaena 22 Marrero et al. (1998) 19 Aquifoliaceae Ilex 22 Cuenod et al. (2000) 20 Asteraceae Pulicaria 22 F”
- Historical inferences from the self‐incompatibility locus (2003, methodology): “This work was funded in part by NSF DEB 0108173 to J.R.K. and DEB-0309184 to B.I. and J.R.K. Research review www.newphytologist.org © New Phytologist (2003) 161: 97–105 Review104”