Comparison of Volatility Measures: A Risk Management Perspective
By Christian T. Brownlees, Giampiero M. Gallo. 2010
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c59500643238fc688e85fce5c8bf4168cfc7b3c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Esther Ruiz
- Kevin Sheppard
- Asger Lunde
- Andrew J. Patton
- P. R. Hansen
- N. Shephard
- Tim Bollerslev
- Timo Teräsvirta
In Finance
- Kevin Sheppard
- Esther Ruiz
- P. R. Hansen
- Asger Lunde
- Andrew J. Patton
- N. Shephard
- Tim Bollerslev
- Timo Teräsvirta
Citations in the corpus
- Optimally Harnessing Inter-Day and Intra-Day Information for Daily Value-at-Risk Prediction (2013, unknown): “t=R φα(rt+1 − (λ0 + λ1q̂1,t + λ2q̂2,t)), (11)”
- Modelling changes in the unconditional variance of long stock return series (2012, background): “More recently, Engle and Gonzalo Rangel (2008) and Brownlees and Gallo (2010) applied the same multiplicative decomposition as van Bellegem and von Sachs (2004).”
- Forecasting Volatility Using High-Frequency Data (2011, background): “Some work towards an understanding of this is Brownless and Gallo (2010), but there is still much more to investigate.”
- Generalized dynamic factor models and volatilities: estimation and forecasting (2017, unknown): “It has been shown by Alizadeh et al. (2002) and Brownlees and Gallo (2010) that theoretically, numerically, and empirically the adjusted intra-daily log rangeis a highly efficient volatility proxy robust to microstructure noise and hence at least equally as good as more sophisticated alternatives…”
- NETS: Network estimation for time series (2019, unknown): “However, despite its simplicity a number of contributions have pointed out that the high–low range estimator performs satisfactorily relative to more sophisticated alternatives (Alizadeh, Brandt, and Diebold, 2002; Brownlees and Gallo, 2010).”
- Realising the future: forecasting with high frequency based volatility (HEAVY) models (2010, methodology): “25: 197–231 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/jae”
- Modelling volatility by variance decomposition (2013, methodology): “For a similar approach using a di¤erent version of splines, see Brownlees and Gallo (2010).”
- Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting (2016, background): “…(1998) tests are still the most popular ones both among practitioners and in the academic literature; see, for example, Chan and Gray (2006), Brownlees and Gallo (2010), Pérignon and Smith (2010b), Grigoletto and Lisi (2009, 2011), Zikovic and Aktan (2011), Chen, Gerlach, Hwang and McAleer…”
- Exponential GARCH Modeling With Realized Measures of Volatility (2016, unknown): “Additional MEM specifications have been explored and developed in Cipollini, Engle, and Gallo (2009) and Brownless and Gallo (2010).”
- Forecast combinations for value at risk and expected shortfall (2020, methodology): “We take this approach, and follow Brownlees and Gallo (2010) by implementing the HAR model with the realized volatility replaced by the intraday range, as in the following expressions:”
- A comprehensive review of Value at Risk methodologies (2014, methodology): “The models based on RV work quite well to estimate VaR (see Asai et al., 2011; Brownlees and Gallo, 2010; Clements et al., 2008; Giot and Laurent, 2004; Andersen et al., 2003).”
- Semiparametric Conditional Quantile Models for Financial Returns and Realized Volatility (2013, methodology): “…models for realized volatility with either parametric or nonparametric estimators of conditional distributions, and the recent contributions by Brownlees & Gallo (2009), Shephard & Sheppard (2009) and Maheu & McCurdy (2010), who base their predictive densities on parametric return-based…”