Communicating Ecological Indicators to Decision Makers and the Public

By A. Schiller, C. Hunsaker, Michael Kane, A. Wolfe, Virginia H. Dale, G. Suter, C. Russell, G. Pion, M. Jensen, Victoria C. Konar. 2001

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Introduction EMAP’s Indicators A Region as a Case Study Development of Common-language Indicators Testing the Common-language Indicators From “values” to “valued aspects” Testing CLIs in relation to valued aspects of the environment Discussion Final thoughts Responses to this Article Acknowledgments Literature Cited Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c578fc17b91bd7ebd89062a43db86ed68135ce7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Hoshin V. Gupta
2. E. McNie

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Hoshin V. Gupta
2. E. McNie

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Link
2. W. Overholtz
3. Michael Fogarty
4. S. Jennings

Citations in the corpus

• Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management (2008, background): “…between knowledge and practice (Acreman, 2005; communication between scientist and decision makers is ubiquitous in all areas of environmental policy making including land use management and water resources management (e.g., Callahan et al., 1999; Schiller et al., 2001; Siepen and Westrup, 2002).”
• Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature (2007, background): “Other researchers call for improved translation of scientific information into a more common language that is more easily understood by decision makers (Schiller et al., 2001).39 Siepen and Westrup (2002) suggest that scientists need to develop a wider range of communication skills in general.”
• The significance of stranding data as indicators of cetacean populations at sea: Modelling the drift of cetacean carcasses (2012, background): “They are considered as communication tools between scientists and policy-makers (Mace and Baillie, 2007; Müller and Lenz, 2006; Schiller et al., 2001; Turnhout et al., 2007).”
• The Soil Management Assessment Framework (2004, unknown): “…allows interpretations to reflect both ecosystem function and using a curve-fitting program, CurveExpert v. 1.3 shareware farmer and societal values regarding crop production and envi-(available online at http://curveexpert.webhop.biz/ [verified 22 ronmental protection (Schiller et al., 2001).”
• Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context (2002, background): “Other researchers have reached similar conclusions (e.g., Constable 2001; Sainsbury and Sumaila 2001; Schiller et al. 2001).”