Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11

By Peter J. Huwe, Qifang Xu, Maxim V. Shapovalov, Vivek Modi, M. Andrake, Roland L. Dunbrack. 2016

10 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XII (2017, positive): “40 Building on those results, in CASP12, Russ Altman (Stanford, USA) led a collaborative effort in this area, 41 examining regions suggested by the target providers as most functionally relevant and other areas with known functional involvement.”
Biological and Functional Relevance of CASP Predictions (2017, methodology): “We aim to provide two references for users who are considering structural models for functional annotation: (1) Can model-1 (the best in terms of their structure feature) provide robust functional insights? (2) Can the server (the average of all models) provide models with good functional features? ”