Training methods of military dog handlers and their effects on the team's performances

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review (2016, methodology): “Aversive methods, including pulling the leash and hanging, were associated with low body postures indicative of fear or distress and poor performance in military working dogs (Haverbeke et al., 2008), and those military dogs suspected to have been handled roughly in the past were perceived to be mor”
The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs—A review (2017, background): “In fact, according to Haverbeke et al. (2008), the opposite appears to be true.”
Effects of 2 training methods on stress-related behaviors of the dog (Canis familiaris) and on the dog–owner relationship (2014, methodology): “Furthermore, distraction during training, behavior problems, lower obedience, and playful behaviors were linked to negative reinforcement e based method (Roll and Unshelm, 1997; Hiby et al., 2004; Haverbeke et al., 2008; Herron et al., 2009; Rooney and Cowan, 2011).”