SUBVOCALIZATION AND AUDITORY IMAGERY: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE INNER EAR AND INNER VOICE

By J. D. Smith, D. Reisberg, Meg Wilson. 1992

Subfields: Neuroscience, Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neuroscience

1. Timothy Hubbard

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

1. Timothy Hubbard
2. Ben Alderson-Day
3. Charles Fernyhough
4. David Poeppel
5. Xing Tian

Citations in the corpus

• Auditory imagery: empirical findings. (2010, background): “Reisberg et al. (1989); Smith, Reisberg, and Wilson (1992); and Smith et al. (1995) discussed differences between the inner voice and the inner ear.”
• Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech (2010, unknown): “Therefore, although speakers may employ fine-grained articulatory simulations under some circumstances (e.g., when processing orthographic stimuli in J. D. Smith et al.,1992), these may not be required for all inner speech tasks.”