History for Visual Dialog: Do we really need it?

By Shubham Agarwal, Trung Bui, Joon-Young Lee, Ioannis Konstas, Verena Rieser. 2020

77 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Visual Dialogue involves “understanding” the dialogue history (what has been discussed previously) and the current question (what is asked), in addition to grounding information in the image, to accurately generate the correct response. In this paper, we show that co-attention models which explicitly encode dialoh history outperform models that don’t, achieving state-of-the-art performance (72 % NDCG on val set). However, we also expose shortcomings of the crowdsourcing dataset collection procedure, by showing that dialogue history is indeed only required for a small amount of the data, and that the current evaluation metric encourages generic replies. To that end, we propose a challenging subset (VisdialConv) of the VisdialVal set and the benchmark NDCG of 63%.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Multimodal Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Steven C. H. Hoi
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Caiming Xiong
  4. Luc Van Gool
  5. Irwin King
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  8. Xiaogang Wang

In Multimodal Learning

  1. Steven C. H. Hoi
  2. Hueiseok Lim
  3. Irwin King
  4. Verena Rieser
  5. Michael R. Lyu
  6. Caiming Xiong
  7. Shafiq R. Joty
  8. Xiuyi Chen

Citations in the corpus