What's worth the effort: Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions
By Shari Liu, Tomer D. Ullman, Josh Tenenbaum, Elizabeth S. Spelke. 2017
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Trevor Darrell
- Kristen Grauman
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- James M. Rehg
Citations in the corpus
- Machine Theory of Mind (2018, background): “This inference resembles the ability of children to jointly reason about agents’ costs and rewards when observing short traces of past behaviour (Jara-Ettinger et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017).”
- Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Tasks (2023, background): “In fact, there are already many reasonable computational models that try to directly capture this ability (e.g. 31; 32; 33; 34; 35; 10), and which put formal skin on decades-old proposals in cognitive science and psychology.”
- Theory of mind as inverse reinforcement learning (2019, background): “Using this assumption, even children can infer other people’s preferences [6,7], knowledge [8,9], and moral standing [10–12].”
- Incremental Object Learning From Contiguous Views (2019, background): “Other works have developed specific computational models for children’s cognitive processes (see [30] for a recent example).”