The Species Problem, Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology

By D. N. Stamos. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c319ea9a463d31bcfd5db1001deaa88d813e4ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jose Padial
2. I. J. De la Riva
3. J. Fuerst
4. E. Zalta
5. Uri Nodelman
6. C. Allen
7. Fiona Macpherson
8. Agnes Moors

Citations in the corpus

• A response to recent proposals for integrative taxonomy (2010, background): “Many systematists might disagree with our position, and would argue that more operational conceptual frameworks provide more accurate ways for ‘discovering’ species (e.g. Nixon & Wheeler, 1990; Mallet, 1995; Stamos, 2003; Fitzhugh, 2005; Wheeler, 2008).”
• The Nature of Race (2015, background): “For a discussion and critique of this solution, readers are referred to Stamos (2003). less differentiated groups, since there is nothing else which they could be.”
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: a dynamic reference work (2003, background): “” These issues in their historical extension continue to generate contemporary disputes that oppose “species as sets” to “species as spatio-temporal individuals” (Dupré 1993; Ereshefsky “Species” this encyclopedia, 1992; Ghiselin 1997; Hull 1989, 1999; R. A. Richards 2010; Sloan 2012; Stamos 2003; W”