Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora
By Stefan Gries. 2008
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c21dbcf9cf398933ea36ad1cdc21290902f0f51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- K. Kyle
- Petar Milin
- Michael Ramscar
- Serge Sharoff
- R. Harald Baayen
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Holger Schwenk
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- K. Kyle
- Petar Milin
- Michael Ramscar
- R. Harald Baayen
- Serge Sharoff
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Harald Baayen
In Language and Linguistics
- Petar Milin
- Michael Ramscar
- K. Kyle
- Serge Sharoff
- R. Harald Baayen
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Jalal Al-Tamimi
Citations in the corpus
- Know thy Corpus! Robust Methods for Digital Curation of Web corpora (2020, methodology): “α is effectively the proportion of texts in which a word occurs, also it is the same as Engvall’s measure (Gries, 2008).”
- Frequency in lexical processing (2016, background): “Following work in statistics (Johnson & Kotz, 1977), the number of different texts in which a word occurs is known as its dispersion (Baayen, 1996; Gries, 2008, 2010).”
- Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: further explorations (2010, neutral): “Correlations between Balota and Spieler's (1998) response time latencies (young speakers) and the dispersion measures and adjusted frequencies surveyed in Gries (2008).”
- The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, neutral): “Further reading Benesch (2001); Pennycook (1999, 2010)”
- Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application (2015, background): “Less common, but potentially as important as other measures of frequency, are indices based on frequency ranges, which provide a count of in how many documents in a corpus a lexical item occurs (e.g., Gries, 2008; Crossley, Subtirelu, & Salsbury, 2013).”