Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Different Correlation Types and Estimation Methods
By Randall Schumacker, S. Beyerlein. 2000
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c0906fda6b2531672529e856c89dc4adc4b599a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dawn Iacobucci
- J. Edwards
- Marcello M. Mariani
- Maria Ek Styvén
- Christian Martin
- J. Lucke
- Mike C. Parent
- S. Czellár
Citations in the corpus
- Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics (2010, result): “Research consistently says the correlations (and corresponding parameter estimates) are attenuated (i.e., underestimated), and standard errors and χ2 values overestimated (Schumacker & Beyerlein, 2000), which is good news because all these results err in the statistically conservative direction.”
- The Growth of Structural Equation Modeling: 1994-2001 (2003, unknown): “…& Molenaar, 1999); canonical correlation (Fan, 1997); MANOVA and discriminant analysis (Cole, Arvey, Salas, & Maxwell, 1993); item response models (Schumacker & Beyerlein, 2000); time series models (Hershberger, Molenaar, & Corneal, 1996); multidimensional scaling (Maydeu-Olivares, 1999); and…”