Industrial Concentration and Regional Growth: Evidence from the Prefectures
By R. Dekle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bffb3c647999e1ff5236b9de263adba9049370b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- F. Cingano
- Fabiano Schivardi
- Gilles Duranton
- Stefano Federico
- Sabrina Lucia Di Addario
- Daniela Vuri
- G. A. Minerva
- Gianluca Benigno
In Political Science and International Relations
- F. Cingano
- Fabiano Schivardi
- Gilles Duranton
- Sabrina Lucia Di Addario
- Stefano Federico
- G. A. Minerva
- Daniela Vuri
- Gianluca Benigno
Citations in the corpus
- Identifying the Sources of Local Productivity Growth (2004, background): “Similar conclusions are reached by Dekle (2002) for the Japanese prefectures, although he finds no evidence of dynamic externalities in manufacturing.”
- Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited (2009, unknown): “…labour, inputs, suitable production sites, and even technological spillovers are expected to be easier to access in more agglomerated regions, giving rise to intra-industry agglomeration economies, also known as localisation economies (Marshall, 1920; Henderson et al., 1995; Dekle, 2002).”
- Productivity growth in the Old and New Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities (2013, unknown): “From different theoretical perspectives, Duranton and Puga (2001) and Boschma (2005) show that new products and industries benefit more from a diversified environment whilst mature industries concentrate, and can be delocalized, in more specialized areas when their production is standardized.”