Beyond the WTO ?An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements

By Henrik Horn, P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir. 2009

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bf6560989c1533b08463c8e7d4addcc9475dab9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Law

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

North-South Standards Harmonization and International Trade (2013, unknown): “Covering 28 EIAs where the EU or the US is a partner, Horn et al. (2009) show that all except two US agreements include TBT provisions.”
An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model (2016, background): “The 2013 World Trade Report codified provisions for a set of 100 RTAs signed between 1958 and 2011 by extending the data developed by Horn et al. (2010). The different RTAs’ provisions are classified into one of the 52 policy areas identified by the authors.”
Does dialogue work? The effectiveness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements (2014, methodology): “In general, US PTA labor provisions tend to be much more legalistic in nature than the EU PTA labor provisions (Grynberg and Qalo 2006; Heydon and 924 Journal of European Public Policy Woolcock 2009; Horn et al. 2010).”
Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade? (2014, background): “The former is far more extensive in terms of trade liberalisation than the latter, and incorporates many more policy domains that are legally enforceable to foster economic integration (Horn et al. 2010).”
Greening up: the effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreements (2017, background): “While both the US and EU include environmental standards in their PTAs, they also pursue different approaches toward their design (Horn et al. 2010; Jinnah and Morgera 2013, Postnikov 2014).”
Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements (2013, unknown): “Second, provisions that are excluded from the agreements’ dispute settlement system may still be subject to dispute settlement flowing from commitments that the Parties may have elsewhere.”
Trade creation and trade diversion in deep agreements (2017, methodology): “9 Following the methodology proposed by Horn et al. (2014), the focus is on 52 policy areas (see Table A1 in Annex A), divided into areas that are currently under the mandate of the WTO such as tariffs, antidumping duties and subsidies (referred to as “WTO +”) and areas where the WTO has no comprehe”
The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements (2016, background): “Horn et al. (2010) explore a wide range of WTO-extra clauses that cover NTIs in 14 EU and 10 US agreements and assess their enforceability.”