Overview of the Second BUCC Shared Task: Spotting Parallel Sentences in Comparable Corpora

By Pierre Zweigenbaum, Serge Sharoff, Reinhard Rapp. 2017

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper presents the BUCC 2017 shared task on parallel sentence extraction from comparable corpora. It recalls the design of the datasets, presents their final construction and statistics and the methods used to evaluate system results. 13 runs were submitted to the shared task by 4 teams, covering three of the four proposed language pairs: French-English (7 runs), German-English (3 runs), and Chinese-English (3 runs). The best F-scores as measured against the gold standard were 0.84 (German-English), 0.80 (French-English), and 0.43 (Chinese-English). Because of the design of the dataset, in which not all gold parallel sentence pairs are known, these are only minimum values. We examined manually a small sample of the false negative sentence pairs for the most precise French-English runs and estimated the number of parallel sentence pairs not yet in the provided gold standard. Adding them to the gold standard leads to revised estimates for the French-English F-scores of at most +1.5pt. This suggests that the BUCC 2017 datasets provide a reasonable approximate evaluation of the parallel sentence spotting task.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Furu Wei
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Sebastian Ruder
  8. Kyunghyun Cho

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Iryna Gurevych
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Sebastian Ruder
  6. Kyunghyun Cho
  7. Samuel R. Bowman
  8. Hinrich Schütze

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Iryna Gurevych
  3. John Wieting
  4. Nils Reimers
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Kevin Gimpel
  7. Sebastian Ruder
  8. Niklas Muennighoff

Citations in the corpus