Influence of food web structure on the growth and bioenergetics of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)
By Ivano Pazzia, M. Trudel, M. Ridgway, J. Rasmussen. 2002
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bdf92d789542bb0d4b17eb10fd7579db4300d64
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Response of non-native lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to 15 years of harvest in Yellowstone Lake, Yellowstone National Park (2011, background): “However, lake trout population metrics are strongly influenced by lake size, lake productivity, and diet (Trippel 1993; Shuter et al. 1998; Pazzia et al. 2002).”
- The role of sewage in a large river food web (2003, background): “2000) and detritus (CE = 2%; Benke 1996)), 5% for algivorous–detritivorous fish, 10% for invertivorous fish, and 15% for piscivorous fish (Trudel et al. 2001; Pazzia et al. 2002).”
- Essential fatty acids in the planktonic food web and their ecological role for higher trophic levels (2004, background): “Their beneficial effects are quickly realized in the form of enhanced somatic growth (Elser et al. 2000; Wacker and Von Elert 2001; Pazzia et al. 2002) and reproductive rates (Williamson et al.”
- Western Lake Trout Woes (2009, background): “Because lake trout must consume large fish prey, even if they are rare, to reach larger body sizes (Hubert et al. 1994; Pazzia et al. 2002), introduced lake trout often prey on the adults of valued sport and rare native fishes in waters of the western United States.”
- The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. (2005, background): “…do not reach higher trophic position simply because of energetic constraints (i.e. productivity) as the density of these lake trout in small lakes, where studied, have been found to be at high densities relative to large lakes (Vander Zanden & Rasmussen 1996; Davis et al. 1997; Pazzia et al. 2002).”