Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets
By H. Hentschke, Maik C. Stüttgen. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2011
404 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ba5fcece1707cea0bb5abad3f5002ef4919ba39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder (2018, positive): “This provided evidence for a significant difference between the two means (1.72% difference, W = 1242, p .001) with a Rank-Biserial Correlation of rrb=.49 (an estimation of effect size for non-parametric data, Hentschke and Stüttgen (2011)).”
- Dichotomous frequency-dependent phase synchrony in the sensorimotor network characterizes simplistic movement (2024, methodology): “To quantify how connectivity changes differed throughout the move and wait epochs, the effect size was calculated using Hedges’ g 42,43 in a sliding window (1-s width, 0.5-s step).”