The relationship between depth, age and gravity in the oceans

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Global dynamic topography observations reveal limited influence of large-scale mantle flow (2016, methodology): “If these two columns are in isostatic equilibrium, then Pa = Pb. Expanding Equations 26 and 27, cancelling out common factors, and re-arranging yields ∆T = U (1− αT◦) hα .”
Exploring the combined role of eustasy and oceanic island thermal subsidence in shaping biodiversity on the Galápagos (2014, result): “Although these parameters have been observed to hold in numerous studies, more recent works have proposed 5–12% reductions of B (Hillier & Watts, 2005; Crosby et al., 2006; Korenaga & Korenaga, 2008), 329 being the latest estimation (Hillier, 2010).”
Temperature, lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary, and heat flux beneath the Antarctic Plate inferred from seismic velocities (2015, background): “However, for oceanic crust older than ~70 90Ma, the relationship between crustal age, thickness, and heat flow breaks down [Parsons and Sclater, 1977; Schroeder, 1984; Crosby et al., 2006].”
The relationship between shear wave velocity, temperature, attenuation and viscosity in the shallow part of the mantle (2013, background): “(2008) and excluding the regions that Crosby et al. (2006) classified as not having typical oceanic structure.”