A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model for Turbulent Flow Predictions

By F. Menter, M. Kuntz, R. Bender. 2003

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows (2008, methodology): “From such examples and the channel flow simulations in the original SAS proposal [120], it seems that, for flows where traditional URANS methods yield steady flow predictions, the driving force pushing SAS to its unsteady mode is missing.”
A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities (2006, methodology): “In contrast, two recently proposed methods, scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) and turbulence-resolving RANS (TRRANS), do not use the grid spacing [16,17].”
Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective (2009, methodology): “Although this argument is convincing at first, it was recently shown in a series of articles (Menter et al. 2003, Menter and Egorov 2004, 2005, 2006, Menter et al. 2006a) that this behaviour is not directly related to the Reynolds averaging, but to the specific way such models have been derived in…”
The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 1: Theory and Model Description (2010, neutral): “, [16]).”
Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model (2003, methodology): “A possible alternative to current DES formulations is the extension of the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) approach [15] to the SST model.”