Critically appraising qualitative research

By A. Kuper, L. Lingard, W. Levinson. British medical journal, 2008

812 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68dc90961e03bddcdb35585a07d1968377b3adfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Donna Adkins
2. Jessica L. Johnson
3. Sheila Chauvin

In General Health Professions

1. Donna Adkins
2. Jessica L. Johnson
3. Sheila Chauvin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Donna Adkins
2. Jessica L. Johnson
3. Sheila Chauvin

Citations in the corpus

• Language and literacy (2009, neutral): “Reimagining literacy discourses with the inclusion of older adults at the forefront provides an opportunity to question the foundational definitions of literacy found in these texts and invites possibilities for literacy futures where older learners are not seen as deficient.”
• A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2019, methodology): “The framework defines and justifies the research question, the methodology selected to answer that question, and the perspectives from which interpretation of results and conclusions will be made.(5,6,20) Developing a well-integrated conceptual framework is essential to establishing a research topic”