Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth
By Jochim Hansen, Alice Dechêne, M. Wänke. 2008
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b358e3039c3a3cd9744a0e33f525b57adbb8e19
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence (2009, background): “This subtle positive affect can be become object to experiential awareness, especially when fluency of ongoing processes changes rapidly (eg, Whittelsea & Williams, 2001a , b ), for instance, when processes execute either more easily or with more difficulty than expected (eg, Hansen, Dechene, & Wa”
- Relative Processing Fluency (2015, methodology): “Using the same paradigm of changes in figure-ground contrast as Hansen and colleagues (Hansen et al., 2008), Laham, Alter, and Goodwin (2009) found that descriptions of moral violations (for example, “A family eats its dead dog”) were rated as less morally objectionable when they were printed in hig”