Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving

By Annika Larsson, Katja Kircher, J. Hultgren. 2014

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b161db79b687a0b887f9f41816e1c2236933634

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

1. Miltos Kyriakidis
2. J. D. de Winter
3. Riender Happee

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Miltos Kyriakidis
2. J. D. de Winter
3. Riender Happee
4. Neville A Stanton
5. Christopher D. D. Cabrall
6. Brady Michael Kuhl

In Social Psychology

1. J. D. de Winter
2. Miltos Kyriakidis
3. Riender Happee
4. Neville A Stanton
5. Christopher D. D. Cabrall
6. Brady Michael Kuhl
7. Mark S. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014, background): “A study by Larsson, Kircher, and Hultgren (2014) in a high-fidelity driving simulator found longer brake reaction times to a cut-in vehicle for ACC driving than for manual driving (3.21 vs. 1.34 s; N = 28 vs.”
• Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey (2016, background): “For example, as Larsson, Kircher, and Hultgren (2014) showed, when drivers get accustomed to ACC, they become more aware of the system’s limitations and respond quicker to emergency situations.”