Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives
By Gulfem Isiklar Alptekin, Gülçin Büyüközkan. Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 2007
357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8af5586122bb55e5aedd947c822533c698fd4fcd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Reza Zanjirani Farahani
- Somayeh Soheilirad
- Fatemeh Torfi
- Norhayati Zakuan
- M. Saman
- Abbas Mardani
- Mehrbakhsh Nilashi
- Shabnam Rezapour
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Reza Zanjirani Farahani
- Somayeh Soheilirad
- Fatemeh Torfi
- Norhayati Zakuan
- M. Saman
- Abbas Mardani
- Mehrbakhsh Nilashi
- Shabnam Rezapour
Citations in the corpus
- Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives (2010, background): “With this characteristic, decision makers have the possibility to easily examine and scale the problem in accordance with their requirements [10].”
- A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments (2017, background): “widely used to evaluate a finite number of decision alternatives with multiple criteria [5, 6].”