Bulk viscosity of QCD matter near the critical temperature
By D. Kharzeev, K. Tuchin. 2007
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Kubo's formula relates bulk viscosity to the retarded Green's function of the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. Using low energy theorems of QCD for the latter we derive the formula which relates the bulk viscosity to the energy density and pressure of hot matter. We then employ the available lattice QCD data to extract the bulk viscosity as a function of temperature. We find that close to the deconfinement temperature bulk viscosity becomes large, with viscosity-to-entropy ratio ζ/s ~ 1.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ae71fbf240b5cd609b74dc4533627daa0daf5e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- E. Kiritsis
- Francesco Nitti
- U. Gursoy
- Georgios Michalogiorgakis
- L. Mazzanti
- Silviu S. Pufu
- S. Gubser
- F. Rocha
In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- Improved Holographic QCD (2010, methodology): “So far there have been two approaches that have calculated the bulk viscosity in YM/QCD, [29, 30, 31, 32] and have both indicated that the bulk viscosity rises near the phase transition as naive expectation would suggest.”
- Bulk viscosity of strongly coupled plasmas with holographic duals (2008, background): “Recent interest has attached to the possibility of a dramatic rise in the bulk viscosity ζ near the cross-over temperature Tc of QCD where confinement and chiral symmetry breaking set in [2, 3].”
- Transport properties of the quark-gluon plasma (2011, background): “ spectral function of the operator O⋆ (192), which is smooth at the origin. Using Eq. (193), one finds 2 Z ∞ 0 dω ω [ρ⋆(ω,T)−ρ⋆(ω,0)] = 3(1−3c2 s)(e+p)−4(e−3p). (194) Eq. (185) was already obtained in [95], but the presence of the ωδ(ω) term in ρθ was missed. In [57], a finite spatial momentum k was u”